Home

Advertisement

Customize
11 August 2008 @ 01:50 pm
Taking another look at the VP list, though not much has changed. Interestingly, those who appear to want the job generally seem to be less worthy of being picked than many of those who don't. Only a few in the top 10 seem open to being chosen, though it's possible others are just playing it safe and would accept if asked. As for the Republicans, I'm sticking with Romney. The only way McCain wins, barring a huge Obama collapse, is to play the electoral map well and he needs to at least take the shot with Romney for New Hampshire, Michigan, and the Mountain West.

10. Wes Clark (General, Arkansas)- He's a tough one. There is of course the military background and lack of Washington stain which is a good combination. However, there's also his uninspiring 2004 campaign and the comment about McCain that got blown out of proportion last month. It could work but I'm not sold either way.
9. Sherrod Brown (Current Senator, Ohio)- He opposed the war as a Congressman and has the right home state but his protectionist leanings may paint the Democratic ticket as too anti-trade. I'm not really sure what the country's mood on NAFTA is at this point. He also seems to be unwilling to take the position.
8. Jack Reed (Current Senator, Rhode Island)- One of those guys where you wonder if it'd be a good idea given he looks like a blatant "Look I got my own Dick Cheney" but who knows. He doesn't seem to want the job but he and Obama do seem to get along well.
7. Brian Schweitzer (Current Governor, Montana)- He's cruising to re-election and probably wouldn't take the job but he's a good governor and has the kind of folksy John Edwards charm without all the baggage. Of course, they'd try to tag him like Obama as inexperienced and lacking foreign policy credentials but frankly it's either going to be that or "how is he an agent of change?" anyway. McCain's campaign surely has their dual press releases ready to attack whoever the pick is as a bad one.
6. Russ Feingold (Current Senator, Wisconsin)- I don't think he wants the job and has had a few too many kind words to say about McCain lately but I think he's a good Senator who has an independent streak that overcomes partisanship. He probably wouldn't play as well electorally but I think he's qualified.
5. Phil Bredesen (Current Governor, Tennessee)- I haven't mentioned him much before but there would be some value in picking a popular Southern governor. If Mark Warner won't do it, Bredesen appears to be the best choice among the rest of the Southern states. He has a more impressive record than Tim Kaine though obviously in a less competitive state. He's been governor for 5 1/2 years and founded HealthAmerica Corp, a successful company. In the mold of Mike Bloomberg, he doesn't accept a salary as governor because of his wealth accrued in business which is a nice talking point for his character. His "openness and accountability" governing style would play well with Obama's message. Of course, the negative is no foreign policy experience but nobody has it all.
4. Evan Bayh (Former Governor/Current Senator, Indiana)- He's the safe pick of the bunch in terms of rocking the boat but a lot of liberals dislike him and perhaps there's a reason why he's always considered for VP but never picked.
3. Joe Biden (Current Senator, Delaware)- Has generally had his gaffes and rambling under control and offers a solid voice on foreign policy. He's at the top of my list of people who appear to have a realistic chance of being picked.
2. Ted Strickland (Former Congressman/Current Governor, Ohio)- He has never showed a hint of interest in the job but given his opposition to the war, swing state home, and current position outside Washington, he'd be a good choice. One negative is that I believe his approval in Ohio is not exactly high at the moment.
1. Mark Warner (Former Governor, Virginia)- It appears he's still unwilling to be the pick and there have been no rumblings about Obama currently considering him but I still think he's the easy #1 choice. Obviously his perceived flaw will be lack of foreign policy experience but it's hard to argue with a very popular governor with a good record in business and on the economy.
 
 
13 July 2008 @ 07:29 pm

When Wes Clark made his comment about John McCain, it was treated by Republicans and the McCain campaign as if it was the worst political attack of the century. The McCain campaign issued 16 press releases in 1 day to display their outrage over Clark's comments. It was decided that Wes Clark, who supported Hillary Clinton until 3 weeks prior and had no role on the Obama campaign, was part of an orchestrated effort to devalue John McCain's military record. That's some pretty serious surrogate bashing. They probably should've known the fake outrage bonanza would come back to bite them in the ass.

Now, Phil Gramm made his "nation of whiners" comments and suddenly surrogates are insignificant, even when that surrogate happens to be one of the, if not the biggest, economic advisors on the campaign and a campaign co-chair and the man who John McCain is good friends with and endorsed in the 1996 election primary. But all of that doesn't matter according to the McCain campaign. McCain came out later in the day and said that he speaks for himself, not his surrogates. Never mind the fact that McCain sends surrogates out to speak for him all the time just like all candidates do. Of course, that bullshit wasn't enough. Today, Carly Fiorina went even further in dismissing the role of surrogates, completely reversing everything the McCain campaign had said about Wes Clark and even going against exactly what Fiorina said previously.

From the AP: "'Outside of Washington, where this is an interesting parlor game, I think most Americans are not really focused on what a bunch of surrogates are saying,' Fiorina said on 'Meet the Press' on NBC. 'They're focused on what the candidates are saying.'

Last March, Fiorina sounded more upbeat about people representing the campaign. While discussing her new role with McCain, she told the Web site Pajamas Media, 'I think they're going to see us expand our surrogate program in some interesting ways.'"

So is the McCain campaign going to apologize for flip-flopping on the importance of surrogate statements, especially surrogates who aren't even members of the campaign? Don't hold your breath. When Obama said we've entered silly season, someone should've asked him if silly season ever ends. It still amazes me that flip flops are being made an issue in this campaign given that neither side has any ground to stand on on the issue. Somehow McCain is getting the upper hand because his litany of changes are not being covered as the media's present narrative is "Obama moving to the center."

 
 
 
 

Advertisement

Customize